Cultural Chronology - Soils and Stratigraphy - Artifacts - Ecofacts - CA-MNT-1748/H Home
Ecofacts
Mammal, Bird and Reptile Remains - Fish Remains - Invertebrate Remains
Oxygen Isotope Analysis - Archaeobotanical Remains
MAMMAL, BIRD, AND REPTILE REMAINS
The non–piscine faunal collection from CA–MNT–1748/H includes 1,627 specimens weighing 827.94 g. Burned bones (191 specimens) make up 14.2 percent of the collection. Eight specimens appear to have been worked and are all considered artifacts. Three specimens show cut marks. A total of 312 fragments was identified to species, genus, or family level (23.2%). The majority of the remaining bones (1010 specimens or 60% of the collection) could only be identified to order level and most of these could only be identified as large, medium, or small mammal. A few fragments (22 specimens or less than 2% of the collection) were identified as vertebrata.
| Economically Significant Faunal Remains from CA-MNT-1748/H. | |||||
| Taxon | Common Name | NISP | % | MNI | Weight (g) |
| RODENTS | |||||
| Neotoma sp. | Woodrat | 48 |
36.36 |
30 |
4.64 |
| Subtotal |
48 |
36.36 |
- |
4.64 |
|
| OTHER MAMMALS | |||||
| Canis sp. | Dog/Coyote | 4 |
3.03 |
4 |
2.34 |
| Lepus californicus | Jackrabbit | 7 |
5.3 |
5 |
1.65 |
| Mephitis mephitis | Striped skunk | 1 |
0.76 |
1 |
0.58 |
| Odocoileus hemionus | Mule deer | 13 |
9.85 |
9 |
75.95 |
| Sylvilagus audubonii | Audubon's cottontail | 44 |
33.33 |
12 |
5.95 |
| Sylvilagus sp. | Cottontail rabbit | 13 |
9.85 |
7 |
0.48 |
| Taxidea taxus | Badger | 1 |
0.76 |
1 |
0.41 |
| Urocyon cinereoargenteus | Grey fox | 1 |
0.76 |
1 |
0.4 |
| Subtotal |
84 |
63.64 |
40 |
87.76 |
|
| GRAND TOTAL |
132 |
100 |
70 |
92.4 |
|
Like CA-MNT-910, the site produced an abundance of bones from small burrowing animals, suggesting the likelihood of stratigraphic mixing. Ground squirrel ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi) (NISP=191) are profuse, together accounting for 11.7 percent of the collection. Remains of the pocket gopher (NISP=24), a notorious burrower, are present as well.
While some fraction of the ground squirrel remains and other small animal
remains are probably evidence of prehistoric diets, it is equally clear that
some if not the majority are modern intrusions, and there is no way to distinguish
the modern specimens from the prehistoric ones. Only the bones from the larger,
non–burrowing native animals can be confidently attributed to the prehistoric
occupation. Excluding the remains of burrowing and otherwise intrusive animals,
the excavation produced a total of 132 elements that were most likely of economic
significance to prehistoric site inhabitants. This collection is dominated by
wood rat (Neotoma sp.) (NISP =48; 36.36%), followed by Audubon’s cottontail
rabbit (Sylvilagus audubonii) (NISP = 44; 33.33%), cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagus
sp.)(NISP = 13; 9.85%), deer (Odocoleus hemionus) (NISP = 13; 9.85%), jack rabbit
(Lepus californicus) (NISP = 7; 5.30%) and dog/coyote (Canis latrans) (NISP
= 4; 3.03%). Also represented in low numbers are striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis),
badger (Taxidea taxus) and grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus).
The collection also contains seven elements from non-native species introduced
from Europe into North America during the historic era: one chicken bone, five
cow/steer bones, and one sheep bone. All of these are species that were kept
at nearby Mission San Antonio, and their presence here is consistent with other
evidence for post-contact occupation including the glass trade bead.
Fish remains were analyzed by Ken Gobalet and Kalie Hardin using the reference
collection housed at the Department of Biology, California State University,
Bakersfield. Fish were represented only at CA-MNT-1748/H where a total of 16
elements was recovered, weighing 1.29 g. Of these, 12 were identified to the
family level or better. An additional four fragments were classified simply
as bony fish. The collection included only marine species: cabezon (Scopaenichthys
marmoratus (NISP=5), rockfish (Sebastes sp.) (NISP=3), rock or black prickleback
(Xiphister sp.) (NISP=3),and monkeyface prickleback (Cebidichthys violaceus)
(NISP=1). All of these are rocky coast species that are common among kelp beds
and rock reefs of the Big Sur coast. A fossilized tooth from a shortfin mako
shark was also described in Chapter 5. This item probably of some ornamental
value and was not dietary. An identical element was recovered from CA-MNT-879
suggesting that shark teeth may have had some cultural significance to the Salinan
during the Late Period.
Dietary conversions from the CA-MNT-1748/H show a similar emphasis on terrestrial mammals (86.5%), but marine fish (2.4%) and especially shellfish (11.1%) had significantly more dietary importance at this site than at CA-MNT-910. The percentage for shellfish is one of the higher values obtained from any site within FHL.
![]() |
| Size distribution frequencies of Mussel shells from CA-MNT-1748/H compared to experimental data taken from Big Creek (“pristine environment”) |
Columns were excavated into the completed walls of Units 2 and 6. Unit 2 was excavated to a depth of 50.0 cm, while Unit 6 was excavated to 130 cm. Total recovery volume from the two samples was 0.08 m3. The column samples showed evidence of eight taxa. The column samples were dominated by the remains of California mussel (Mytilus californianus) (93.9%) which is consistent with findings from other sites at FHL including the Late Period component at CA–MNT–237. Most of the other taxa are typical representatives of the high–energy rocky shores found on the Big Sur coast. Mussels were followed in importance by barnacles (Balanus sp.) (3.5%), and chiton (1.6%). It is likely that the barnacles and some of other species were “riders,” or shells that were carried in attached to other species. Experimentation with the so–called stripping strategy used to collect mussels throughout most of the sequence at Big Sur (Jones and Richman 1995) showed that at least ten species of riders, including barnacles, limpets, and turban snails were commonly included with the mussels when this techniques was used. The assemblage from CA–MNT–1748/H is typical of the inventory associated with stripping.
From a recovery volume of 0.08 m3 from the two columns, a total of 773.8 g
of shell was recovered. Extrapolating from the columns volumetrically, this
represents a total of 155.4 kg of shell for the full site recovery volume (16.07
m3). Size estimates were completed for a total of 2090 mussel shells. Size distribution
frequencies conform most closely with a stripping strategy.
Oxygen isotope analyses were completed on 20 mussel (Mytilus californianus)
shells from CA-MNT-1748/H to evaluate the seasonality of mussel collection.
The study builds on the results of previous research reported by Kennett (2002,
2003), and Jones and Kennett (1999). Studies of modern marine molluscs from
known environments indicate that oxygen isotopic analysis is an effective method
for reconstructing sea surface temperature (Epstein et al. 1951, 1953; Glassow
et al. 1994; Kennett and Voorhies 1995, 1996; Killingley 1981; Killingley and
Berger 1979; Shackleton 1969, 1973). This is because the temperature dependent
ratio of 18O to 16O in sea water preserves in calcareous fossils, such as molluscs
(Epstein et al. 1951, 1953; Wefer and Berger, 1991). Incremental samples taken
along a shell’s growth axis enable reconstruction of oxygen isotopic ratios,
and hence, seasonal temperature changes through the life of a mollusc. Readings
from the final growth increment of a mussel’s shell indicate sea temperature
at the time the mollusc was collected, which can in turn be used to determine
the season during which the shell was collected.
Comparison of oxygen isotopic profiles from the archaeological shells with the
historic temperatures provides insights into the seasonality of mussel collection.
Based on the calibration curve developed by Horibe and Aba (1972), sea-surface
temperatures recorded in the carbonate of the archaeological samples were between
9.96 and 17.23°C. This is within the range of 9.86-17.39°C recorded
historically for the Monterey Bay, but shows warm season temperatures slightly
above the maximum recorded in the shorter historic record available for Big
Sur (9.41- 15.35°C). It is also within the range of 7.31-18.87°C ascribed
to central coast for the period A.D. 1-1700 in the study by Jones and Kennett
(1999).
Findings from edge readings were compared with these ranges to determine season of collection, with additional comparison between edges and samples taken 2 mm in from the edges to determine ascending versus descending temperatures. The latter facilitates a distinction between early summer and winter.
The 20 readings from the terminal edges showed strong patterning. None of the readings were greater than 13.50 °C. All but one clustered between 10.92 and 13.50°C. Thirteen readings fall within the Spring zone and none whatsoever represent the warm sea temperature months of late Summer/early Fall.
Further evaluations on the seven intermediate zone specimens showed that five of these specimens exhibited descending temperatures suggesting winter, while two had ascending temperatures suggesting early summer.
Overall, the available sample produced 13 readings indicating
Spring, 5 suggesting Winter and 2 indicating early Summer. No readings reflect
late Summer/Fall. Assuming that sea mussels were not a primary staple at these
interior sites, and that mussels were transported to the interior when people
migrated from the coast to the interior, the seasonality findings suggest that
movement from the coast to the interior took place between late winter and early
summer—most commonly in the spring. This is consistent with previous studies
from the interior which also suggested an emphasis on spring collection/migration
during the Late Period (Kennett 2003: 272). Previous studies, however, had only
six readings for the Late Period, and the present sample is much more substantive.
by Eric Wohlgemuth
Deposits targeted for flotation sampling included two ash concentrations (Feature 1 Unit 6 and feature 1 Unit 2), a sample of the house floor (Unit 2 Feature 2), and bulk soil from beneath the floor. Column samples from units 2 and 6 were also subjected to flotation recovery. In all, 141.5 liters of sediment were flotation-processed.
Flotation samples were processed employing a manual technique used throughout central California (Wohlgemuth 1989). Buoyant light fraction was collected using 40 inch mesh (0.4 mm) screen, and heavy fraction washed through 3 mm (1/8") and 1 mm (window screen) mesh. Inasmuch as recovery effectiveness measured at other sites ranges from 85-95% of dense nutshell and berry pits, and over 98% of small seeds, only the buoyant light fraction material was sorted for plant remains.
The four feature samples, comprising 58.3 liters of sediment, were selected for analysis.. Light fraction was size sorted using 2.0 mm, 1.0 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.5 mm mesh. Analysis was limited to material larger than 0.5 mm. All seed and fruit remains were sorted from sorted portions of size grades larger than 0.7 mm, while only small seeds were sorted from the 0.5 mm grade. Due to the high frequency of seed and fruit remains in most samples, redundancy of data was reached quickly in sorting the smaller grades. Estimates of total sample contents for each taxon were calculated from the quantities found in subsampled portions (see Table f1). For example, in sample 1 (from the Unit 6 ash lens), acorn nutshell was sorted from 100% of the 2 mm grade, but only 25% of the 1 mm grade and 10% of the 0.7 mm grade. An estimate of the total count of acorn nutshell was calculated by multiplying the 153 pieces in the 0.7 mm grade by ten, and the 56 pieces from the 1.0 mm grade by four. These numbers were added to the 14 pieces from the 2.0 mm grade for an estimated sample 1 total of 1768 acorn nutshell fragments larger than 0.7 mm. In addition to constituent counts, remains of large-seeded nutshell and berry pit fragments were weighed to 0.1 mg. Charcoal larger than 1 mm was weighed to 0.1 gram.
| Table f1. Percentage sampling fractions of size grades by sample. | |||||
Sample |
2 mm grade |
1 mm grade |
0.7 mm grade |
small |
0.5 mm grade |
Number |
large seeds |
large seeds |
large seeds |
seeds |
small seeds |
| 1 | 100 |
25 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
| 2 | 50 |
12.5 |
5 |
10 |
3 |
| 3 | 100 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
10 |
| 4 | 100 |
25 |
5 |
10 |
25 |
All seed, fruit, and underground parts, including unburnt contaminants, were
removed from the sorted portions of samples. Segregated constituents, mostly
burnt seed and fruit residues, were stored in translucent hard plastic centrifuge
tubes with acid-free paper tags denoting site trinomial, sample number, size
grade, and a code for constituent type. All items of a single type or taxon
were stored (in separate centrifuge tubes for each provenience and size grade)
in 2 mil plastic bags with acid-free paper labels. All tags were labeled with
#2 pencil.
| Table f2. Density per Liter of Sediment of CA-MNT-1748/H Large Taxa. | |||||||
| Sample Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Mean | ||
| Feature Designation | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Unit | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Depth (cm below datum) | 19-26 | 53-58 | 51-58 | 58+ | |||
| Sample Volume (liters) | 9 | 27.3 | 14 | 8 | 58.3 | ||
| Taxon | Common Name | ||||||
| Quercus sp. | Oak acorn nutshell | ||||||
| # | 196.4 | 283.2 | 415.3 | 271.1 | 291.5 | ||
| mg | 67.8 | 87.8 | 150.5 | 107.3 | 103.4 | ||
| Pinus sabiniana | Gray pine nutshell | ||||||
| # | 28 | 10.4 | 13.6 | 9.6 | 15.4 | ||
| mg | 77.4 | 17.4 | 31.5 | 42.1 | 42.1 | ||
| Umbellularia californica | Bay nutshell | ||||||
| # | 2.7 | 12.1 | 37.1 | 17.3 | 17.3 | ||
| mg | 1.3 | 10.2 | 17.6 | 9.9 | 9.8 | ||
| Marah sp. | Wild cucumber nutshell | ||||||
| # | – | 0.3 | – | 0.8 | 0.03 | ||
| mg | – | 0.4 | – | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| Prunus ilicifolia | Wild cherry | ||||||
| # | 0.9 | – | 0.1 | – | 0.3 | ||
| mg | 1.1 | – | 0.8 | – | 0.5 | ||
| Aesculus californica | Buckeye nutshell | ||||||
| # | – | 0.3 | – | – | 0.08 | ||
| mg | – | 0.1 | – | – | 0.02 | ||
| Arctostaphylos sp. | Manzanita nutlets | ||||||
| # | – | – | – | 0.5 | 0.1 | ||
| mg | – | – | – | 1.1 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | |||||||
| # | 228 | 306.3 | 466.2 | 299.3 | 325 | ||
| mg | 147.6 | 116 | 200.4 | 161.4 | 156.4 | ||
| Brodiaea/ | |||||||
| Dichelostemma sp. | Brodiaea bulbs | ||||||
| # | – | 0.04 | – | – | 0..01 | ||
| Quercus sp. | Acorn attachment | ||||||
| # | disks | – | 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | |
| Quercus sp. | Acorn kernels | ||||||
| # | - | 0.1 | 1 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1 | |
| Non-grain pieces | |||||||
| # | 0.7 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.1 | ||
| Wood charcoal | |||||||
| grams | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.1 | ||
RESULTS
A total of 1,257 large seed fragments was identified to genus at CA-MNT-1748/H along with 163 small seeds identified to plant family. Of the latter, 76 were identified to genus. In all, 7 genera of large seeds (inedible remains of nutshell and berry pits) are represented along with 11 small seed genera. One bulb fragment of the Brodiaea/Dichelostemma group was also identified. Density per liter of sediment of large and small seed remains (to control for variable sample volume) is presented in Tables f2 and f3, respectively. Information on aboriginal uses and botanical attributes of burnt plant taxa identified is presented in below.
| Table f3. Density per Liter of Sediment of CA-MNT-1748/H Small Taxa. | |||||||
| Sample Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Mean | ||
| Feature Designation | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Unit | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Depth (cm below datum) | 19-26 | 53-58 | 51-58 | 58+ | |||
| Sample Volume (liters) | 9 | 27.3 | 14 | 8 | 58.3 | ||
| Genus | Common Name | ||||||
| Amsinckia sp. | Fiddleneck | – | – | – | 0.4 | 0.1 | |
| Atriplex sp. | Saltbush | – | – | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| Chenopodium sp. | Goosefoot | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | |
| Deschampsia sp. | Hairgrass | 0.6 | – | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | |
| Erodium sp.* | Filaree | 4.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 2.1 | |
| Galium sp. | Bedstraw | – | 0.04 | – | – | 0.01 | |
| Juncus sp. | Rush | – | 1.2 | – | 0.5 | 0.4 | |
| Lepidium sp. | Peppergrass | 0.2 | 1.2 | – | – | 0.4 | |
| Madia sp. | Tarweed | – | – | 0.6 | – | 0.2 | |
| Salvia sp. | Sage | 0.2 | – | – | 0.8 | 0.3 | |
| Vulpia/Festuca sp. | Fescue grass | 1.7 | – | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | |
| Family | |||||||
| Asteraceae | Sunflower | – | 0.04 | – | – | 0.01 | |
| Fabaceae | Bean | 2.4 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.7 | |
| Poaceae | Grass | ||||||
| Seed | – | 0.04 | – | 0.1 | 0.04 | ||
| Fragments | 1.9 | – | 7.9 | 4.5 | 3.6 | ||
| Solanaceae | Nightshade | – | – | 0.1 | – | 0.03 | |
| Unidentified | |||||||
| Seed | 0.9 | – | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.3 | ||
| Fragments | 1.8 | 5.7 | 7.7 | 5.3 | 5.1 | ||
| Total Identified to Genus | 8.0 | 4.1 | 5.9 | 4.8 | 5.7 | ||
| Total Identified to Family | 12.3 | 5.0 | 15.4 | 11.9 | 11.2 | ||
| Total | 15.0 | 10.7 | 25.1 | 19.3 | 17.5 | ||
DISCUSSION
The taxa identified from MNT-1748/H are consistent with findings at dozens of central California archaeological sites (e.g., Wohlgemuth 1996a), and for the most part, with food plants described in the few ethnobotanies from the region (Barrett and Gifford 1933; Bocek 1984; Chesnut 1902; Duncan 1962). The assemblage of charred seeds largely appears to be the product of aboriginal cultural activities, and to be primarily dietary debris.
Charred large seeds from CA-MNT-1748/H are notable for the dominance of acorn nutshell, which by count comprises 89.7% of specimens, and by weight 66.1%. The abundance of acorn residue is consistent with ethnographic characterizations of acorns as the staple plant food of most California Indian groups (Baumhoff 1963; Kroeber 1925; McCarthy 1993). Also ubiquitous are nutshell of gray pine and bay nut; while these pale in comparison to acorn debris, these probably represent nuts commonly consumed at the site. In contrast, other nut and berry remains are comparatively rare, and appear to have been seldom used at the site.
Charred small seeds are uncommon with respect to well-documented Late Period sites further to the north in central California, notably the Bay Area (Wohlgemuth 1996a, 1996b, 1997a, 1997b ). Of interest is the abundance of filaree, an introduced taxa from Eurasia. Filaree comprises 41.2% of the small seeds identified to genus, a very high frequency for central California small seed associations, which tend to be characterized by evenness rather than focused use of particular taxa (Wohlgemuth 1996a). The high frequency of filaree, however, is consistent with several protohistoric and historic period sites sampled in a wider area of central California; where filaree is found consistently in archaeological sites, it tends to dominate the assemblage (Honeysett 1991; Wohlgemuth 1997c; Wohlgemuth and Darcangelo 1994). While filaree is poorly documented in ethnobotanies from the region, it has been identified from coprolites at Bamert Cave (AMA-3) in the Sierran foothills (Heizer and Hester 1973), and thus appears to have been adopted as a food source throughout central California. The high frequency of seeds identified only to the bean family (Fabaceae) at CA-MNT-1748/H is also likely to represent at least some incidence of introduced taxa as well.
In contrast to the abundance of filaree is the absence of several small-seeded
taxa typically found in sites of all time periods, including red maids (Calandrinia
sp.), farewell to spring (Clarkia sp.), wild barley (Hordeum sp.), and maygrass
(Phalaris sp.). While several taxa common in prehistoric deposits were found,
some of them consistently if in low numbers, the small seed assemblage from
CA-MNT-1748/H appears diminished with respect to Late Period sites not only
in frequency, but in diversity.
| Table f4. Ethnographic Use, Seasonal Availability, and Habitats of CA-MNT-1748/H Charred Plant Taxa. | ||||||
| Taxon | Common Name | Growth | Habitats* | Ethnographic Use** | Seed Seasonal | Disturbance |
| Habit* | Availability** | Follower?*** | ||||
| Aesculus californica | Buckeye | Shrub | Shaded slopes and canyons | Nuts eaten | Fall | ?? |
| Amsinckia sp. | Fiddleneck | Herb | Open grasslands | None noted | Late spring | Yes |
| Arctostaphylos sp. | Manzanita | Shrub | Dry slopes and flats | Berries eaten | Summer (fall)**** | ?? |
| Atriplex sp. | Salt bush | Shrub | Alkali flats | Seed eaten | Summer | ?? |
| Brodiaea sp. | Blue dick | Bulb | Varied; mostly dry places | Bulb eaten | Late winter, spring | ?? |
| Chenopodium sp. | Goosefoot | Herb | Dry slopes and plains | Leaves eaten | Spring or summer | Yes |
| Deschampsia sp. | Hairgrass | Grass | Vernal pools, moist areas | None noted | Summer | No |
| Erodium sp.***** | Filaree | Herb | Open grasslands | Greens eaten | Late spring | Yes |
| Galium sp. | Bedstraw | Herb | Varied | Leaves used for medicine | Late spring/summer | No |
| Juncus sp. | Rush | Herb | Moist places | None noted | Summer | ?? |
| Lepidium sp. | Peppergrass | Herb | Grasslands | Whole plant eaten | Late spring | Yes |
| Madia sp. | Tarweed | Herb | Varied, grasslands | Seed eaten | Summer (fall) | Yes |
| Marah sp. | Wild cucumber | Vine | Varied, shaded places | Seed used for medicine,beads,sometimes eaten | Summer | ?? |
| Pinus sabiniana | Gray pine | Tree | Dry slopes and flats | Nuts eaten | Early summer (green nuts) | No |
| Fall (ripe nuts) | ||||||
| Prunus Ilicifolia | Wild cherry, islay | Shrub | Shaded slopes and canyons | Berry pits eaten | Summer | ?? |
| Quercus sp. | Oak | Tree | Varied | Nuts eaten | Fall | ?? |
| Salvia sp. | Sage | Herb or | Varied | Seed eaten | Late spring | ?? |
| Shrub | ||||||
| Umbellularia | ||||||
| californica | Bay | Tree | Moist canyons, riparian zones | Nuts eaten | Fall | ?? |
| Vulpia sp. | Fescue grass | Grass | Dry open places, grasslands | Seed eaten | Late spring | Yes |
| * Munz 1968; Hickman 1993. ** Barrett and Gifford 1933; Bocek 1984; Chesnut 1902; DuBois 1935; Duncan 1963. *** Sources: Stebbins 1965; Timbrook, Johnson and Earle 1982; and personal communications, Michael Barbour, John Menke, Grady Webster, Jon Keeley. **** Parentheses indicate secondary period past peak season.*****Introduced taxon. | ||||||
References Cited
Barrett, S. A., and E. W. Gifford
1933 Miwok Material Culture. Bulletin of the Milwaukee Public Museum 2(4):117-376.
Baumhoff, M. A.
1963 Ecological Determinants of Aboriginal California Populations. Berkeley:
University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology
49:155-236.
Bocek, B. R.
1984 Ethnobotany of Costanoan Indians, California, Based on Collections by John
Harrington. Economic Botany 38(2):240-255.
Chesnut, V. K.
1902 Plants Used by the Indians of Mendocino County, California. Contributions
from the U.S. National Herbarium 7:294-422.
DuBois, C. A.
1935 Wintu Ethnography. University of California Publications in American Archaeology
and Ethnology 26:1-147. Berkeley.
Duncan, J. W.
1963 Maidu Ethnobotany. Unpublished Master's Thesis, California State University,
Sacramento.
Epstein, S., Buchsbaum, R., Lowenstam, H. and H. Urey
1951 Carbonate-Water Isotopic Temperature Scale. Bulletin of the Geological
Society of America 62: 417-426.
1953 Revised Carbonate-Water Isotopic Temperature Scale. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 64: 1315-1326.
Glassow, M., D.J. Kennett, J.P. Kennett, and L.R. Wilcoxon
1994 Confirmation of Middle Holocene Ocean Cooling Inferred from Stable Isotope
Analysis of Prehistoric Shells from Santa Cruz Island, California. In Fourth
California Islands Symposium: Update on the Status of Resources, edited by W.L.
Halvorson and G.J. Maender, pp. 223–232. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural
History.
Heizer, R. F., and T. R. Hester
1973 The Archaeology of Bamert Cave, Amador County, California. University of
California Archaeological Research Facility: Berkeley.
Hickman, J. C. (ed)
1993 The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Honeysett, E.
1991 Appendix F: Seed Analysis Report. In The Fredenberg Site: Cultural Resource
Data Recovery at CA-CAL-1218. Submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Calaveras County, California.
Horibe, Y. and T. Oba
1972 Temperature scales of aragonite-water and calcite-water systems. Fossils
23/24: 69-79.
Jones, T.L., and D. Kennett
1999 Late Holocene Sea Temperatures Along the Central California Coast. Quaternary
Research 51: 74–82.
Jones, T.L., and Richman
1995 On Mussels: Mytilus californianus as a Prehistoric Resource. North American
Archaeologist #16: 33-58.
Kennett, D.J.
2002 Appendix VI: Oxygen Isotope Analysis of California Mussel (Mytillus californianus)
shells. In Prehistory at San Simeon Reef: Archaeological Data Recovery at CA-SLO-179,
and -267, San Luis Obispo County, California. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological
Society, Occasional Paper No. 16.
2003 Appendix I: Oxygen isotope analysis of California mussel (Mytilus californianusis) shells from CA-MNT-521, -569B, -1223, -1227, -1233, and CA-SLO-267. In Prehistoric Human Ecology of the Big Sur Coast, California, Edited by T.L. Jones, 255-275. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 61. University of California, Berkley.
Kennett, D. J. , and B. Voorhies
1995 Middle Holocene Periodicities in Rainfall inferred from Oxygen and Carbon
Isotopic Fluctuations in prehistoric tropical estuarine mollusc shells. Archaeometry
37: 157-170.
1996 Oxygen isotopic analysis of archaeological shells to detect seasonal use of wetlands on the southern Pacific coast of Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science 23: 689-704.
Killingley, J. S.
1981 Seasonality of Mollusk Collecting Determined from 18O Profiles of Midden
Shells. American Antiquity 48: 152-158.
Killingley, J. S. and W. H. Berger
1979 Stable Isotopes in a Mollusk Shell: Detection of Upwelling Events. Science
205:186-188.
Kroeber, A. L.
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin
78. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
McCarthy, H.
1993 A Political Economy of Western Mono Acorn Production. Ph.D. dissertation,
University of California, Davis.
Munz, P. A.
1968 A California Flora and Supplement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shackleton, N. J.
1969 Marine Mollusca in Archaeology. In Science in Archaeology, edited by D.
Brothwell and E. S. Higgs, pp. 407-414. Thames and Hudson, New York.
1973 Oxygen Isotope Analysis as a Means of Determining Season of Occupation of Prehistoric Midden Sites. Archaeometry 15: 133-141.
Stebbins, G. L.
1965 Colonizing Species of the Native California Flora. In The Genetics of Colonizing
Species, edited by H.G. Baker and G.L. Stebbins, pp. 173-191. Academic Press,
New York.
Timbrook, J., J. R. Johnson, and D. Earle
1982 Vegetation Burning by the Chumash. Journal of California and Great Basin
Anthropology 4:163-186.
Wefer, G. and W. H. Berger
1991 Isotope Paleontology: Growth and Composition of Extant Calcareous Species.
Marine Geology 100: 207-248.
Wohlgemuth, E.
1989 Archaeobotanical Remains. Appendix H of Prehistory of the Sacramento River
Canyon, Shasta County, California, by M.E. Basgall and W.R. Hildebrandt. Center
for Archaeological Research at Davis Publication 9.
1996a Resource Intensification in Prehistoric Central California: Evidence from Archaeobotanical Data. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 18(1):81-103.
1996b Plant Remains from Flotation Samples. Chapter 12 of Archaeological Excavations and Burial Removal at Sites CA-ALA-483, CA-ALA-483 Extension, and CA-ALA-555, Pleasanton, Alameda County, California, by R. S. Wiberg, 189-200. Report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University.
1997a Plant Remains. In Archaeological and Geoarchaeological Investigations at Eight Prehistoric Sites in the Los Vaqueros Reservoir Area, Contra Costa County, California, by J. Meyer and J.S. Rosenthal, Appendix H. Report on file at Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University.
1997b Plant Remains from Flotation Samples. Chapter 10 of Archaeological Excavations at Site CA-SOL-356, Fairfield, Solano County, California, by R.S. Wiberg. Report on file, Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University.
1997c Archaeobotanical Analysis. In The Taylors Bar Site (CA-CAL-1180/H): Archaeological and Ethnohistoric Investigations in Calaveras County, California, by R. Milliken. Submitted to Calaveras County Water District.
Wohlgemuth, E., and M. Darcangelo
1994 Floral Remains. In Archaeological Data Recovery: Site CA-SHA-961, Girvan
road at Olney Creek, Redding, Shasta County, California, Final Report of Excavations,
by P. Jensen. Submitted to J. F. Shea Co., Inc., Redding, California.