Richard Vining           

Engl 204

Prof .Marx

May 20, 2006

           

                                    Utopia and Shangri-la

 

 

Often art, whether it is literature or film, is built upon preceding works by means of its openly or covertly copying ideas.  A fine example of this intertextuality is demonstrated between Sir Thomas MoreÕs literary achievement, Utopia and Frank CapraÕs 1937 film, Lost Horizon. Beginning with the structural narrative, MoreÕs novel is told conversationally as Raphael reveals the story of his visit to Utopia. Capra builds upon this technique. He tells the story of a marooned party in Shangri-la to the audience primarily by conversations between one of the elders, Chan and character of Bob, played by Roland Coleman. Another resemblance is the positive response of MoreÕs Ambassadors to Utopia is replicated by the marooned visitors to Shangri-la.  Also similar is the way CapraÕs stranded party learns the value of altruistic work. However, the most important intertextuality is the guiding philosophy of both cultures. 

The primary philosophy of both cultures is equality of abundance.  First, in Utopia, all of the populationÕs needs are fulfilled. Therefore there is no crime because there is no lack.  ÒÉin Utopia, where everything belongs to everybody, no man need fear thatÉhe will ever lack for anything he needsÓ (More 520). A comparative example occurs when Chan the elder of Shangri-la answers Ronald ColemanÕs question regarding crime. Chan states; ÒWe have no crime hereÉwhat makes a criminal? lack usually Éenvy, the desire to process, there can be no crime where there is a sufficiency of everythingÓ (Capra). Another philosophy intertextuality is societyÕs attitudes about wealth.  In Utopia, Ò...they have accumulated a vast treasure, but they do not keep it like a treasure they never use money among themselvesÓ (More 513). Again, Chan the elder speaks; ÒWe have no money as you know itÉ or seek personal fortunesÉwe merely exchange.Ó (Capra).  Money is simply a tool, rather than an object of desire to be greedily possessed. However, the most important shared philosophy is the tranquility of mind resulting from the harmonious lifestyle. In Utopia, ÒIf money disappeared, so would fear, anxiety, worry, toil and sleepless nightÓ (More 522). Capra builds upon this ideal in his Shangri-la; Òliving to 200 years is quite common hereÉ we like to believe it is the absents of struggle in the way we liveÉÓ (Capra). By assuring an equality of abundance and reducing the social value of money, the personality traits of greed, fear, and anxiety and have been eliminated within both cultures.   An individualÕs composure has the highest social value resulting in a harmonious culture.

In conclusion, the intertextuality between MoreÕs Utopia and CapraÕs Lost Horizon are undeniable.  Interestingly, these same intertextuality extents into the political arena. From the European socialist revolution to the American cinema explosion, ThomasÕs MoreÕs Utopia remains fantastically inspirational.

 

 

                                                            Works Cited

 

Lost Horizon. Dir. Frank Capra. Perf. Roland Coleman and Jane Wyatt. Columbia    

Pictures. 1937.

 

More, Thomas. ÒUtopiaÓ. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. W.W. Norton and

Company. 2000. 511-523.