California
Polytechnic State University
English Department
English
391: Topics in Applied Linguistics
Linguistics and Language
Arts
Instructor: Dr. Johanna Rubba
Reading Questions
Last
updated 11/13/09
You will be notified promptly of changes to this page.
This
page is copyrighted 2009 to Johanna Rubba.
It may not be used or reproduced in any form without
the written permission of the author, with the
exception of students enrolled in my classes.
Contents: Click on the author name to go to the questions
for that reading.
Gee
Newby #1
Delpit
O'Grady & Cho #1 (Phon. devel.)
Fredericks
Newby #2
Miller & Gildea
O'Grady & Cho #2 (Vocab./Morphol.
Devel.)
Fisher
and Kruse
Ellis
Nieto
Delpit
Wheeler & Swords
How
to use these questions: Look at the questions before you read.
Answer the questions on notepaper as you read or after you read.
Bring your notes to class. The questions will be the basis for
class discussion of the readings.
|
"What is literacy?" by
James Paul Gee
For a little help with Gee's ideas, click
here,
or scroll to the bottom of the page. "Discourse" in
these questions refers to the notion of discourse as a sort of subculture.
- What discourses have you partially or fully mastered?
List the main ones. Think of groups, clubs, social circles, churches,
etc. -- Cheerleading? How to be a member of a sports team? A good
granddaughter/son? Babysitter? Youth camp counselor?
- One example of discourses that most of us have experienced
is high-school cliques. Describe two or three cliques
in the high school you attended, and what the criteria were
for being a member. How did someone have to dress and talk to be
accepted by the clique? What interests and activities did they pursue?
What were their attitudes towards school and authority?
- What does Gee mean when he says on p. 58 "this
is where we fail mainstream children just as much as non-mainstream
ones"?
- Based
on this article, do you think Gee would favor or disfavor a strongly
multicultural curriculum?
|
The Structure of English, by Michael Newby,
pp. 1-22
- Newby writes
about "knowing" (knowing how to do
something subconsciously) vs. "knowing about", and about "metalanguage";
Gee also talks about "meta-level skills in regard to language" (p.
55). Are the two authors talking about roughly the same thing?
- According to Newby, how do children learn language?
Does his description fit what you have experienced of toddlers learning
language? Give a few examples from your personal experience.
- Have you ever
experienced or witnessed an event of
linguistic intolerance (that is, expression of prejudgment
or prejudice based on a person's language use) (p. 15)? Recount
it briefly.
- Relate what
Newby says about languages and styles to Gee's notion of a discourse:
Is language, dialect, or style part of the "identity kit" for
a discourse? Elaborate on your answer, giving specific examples
from your own experience if you can.
- According to Newby, is there one kind of English
that can be considered more correct than another? Does he view some
dialects as being superior to others? From your experience with school
and/or teaching materials, do our public schools agree with Newby's
view (which is the view of linguists in general) in these matters?
Explain.
|
Education in a Multicultural
Society, by Lisa Delpit.
- At the beginning of this article, Delpit names two
negative results of a clash between a non-mainstream student's home
culture (their primary discourse) and the school culture (a secondary
discourse, and also the dominant discourse?) Describe each of these
negative effects briefly.
- Delpit wants to re-examine the causes of student
underachievement. Instead of focusing on how non-mainstream children
fail in school, she wants us to see how the schools fail non-mainstream
children. She describes numerous teacher beliefs and practices which
actually hurt nonmainstream students instead of helping them. Briefly
describe three of these flawed beliefs/practices.
- What ideas do Gee and Delpit have in common? Name
two or three.
|
"The Study of Language Acquisition"
and "Phonological Development",
Sections 1 &
2 of O'Grady & Cho, "First Language Acquisition"
Section 1:
- How do O'Grady & Cho define a "grammar"?
- What do children's errors like goed, finded, and runned prove?
- What is the difference between naturalistic and experimental
studies of child language acquisition?
Section 2: Phonological
development:
- Children can hear differences between speech sounds
from about 1 month onwards. At about what age do they begin to connect
differences between sounds with differences between word meanings?
- From what you read about babbling, would you conclude
that babbling is innate (i.e., that children are born genetically
programmed to babble), or not? And would you conclude that it is,
or is not, to some degree necessary for normal language acquisition?
Give reasons to justify both your answers. The reasons are in the
text.
|
The Complete Phonemic
Awareness Handbook, A. Fredericks. Pp. 8-33.
- Would you classify
phonemic awareness as a language
ability/subconscious knowledge skill (a subconsciously-controlled
ability), or as a metalinguistic/metaknowledge skill
(conscious knowledge of aspects of language structure)? Justify
your answer in a sentence or two.
- According to
research Fredericks cites, why is phonemic awareness essential
to success in learning to read? Are there differences in reading
success between children who have phonemic awareness and children
who don't? Look for research results that he cites.
- According to
the section entitled "The Stages of
Phonemic Awareness", does phonemic awareness progress synthetically
(that is, children begin by working with individual sounds, gradually
building them up into syllables, then whole words) or analytically
(children begin by comparing whole words, then focus on ever-smaller
word parts, from syllable parts to individual sounds). Defend your
answer by citing support from this section.
|
"Morphemes" & "Words",
Chs. 4 & 5 of Newby Chapter 5:
- Newby demonstrates
a way of determining whether or not a word is an adjective, or
a noun, that is probably not familiar to you. He contrasts this
with the traditional way of determing what part of speech (noun,
verb, adjective, adverb) a word belongs to. Describe Newby's way
and the traditional way, and summarize his arguments to support
the claim that his way (which is the method linguists use) is
more accurate. Do you think this way of determining word class
would be useful for schoolchildren? At which grade levels?
|
"How
Children Learn Words" by
Miller & Gildea
- Do Miller & Gildea
claim that children accomplish the rapid learning of vocabulary
by being taught by adults? Explain your answer.
- Miller & Gildea
describe the two best ways to facilitate vocabulary growth. What
are they? Give some specifics, in terms of, for example, how much
reading should be done, and what kinds of activities teachers should
encourage.
- Summarize Miller & Gildea's
critique of traditional vocabulary tasks such as looking up a new
word in the dictionary, or writing a sentence with a new word that
has been looked up in the dictionary.
|
"Vocabulary
Development"
and "Morphological Development", Sections
3 & 4 of O'Grady & Cho
- Summarize and
give examples (different from those given in the reading) of the
three strategies O'Grady & Cho list
that guide children in acquiring word meanings.
- What is the difference between overextension
and overgeneralization? Give examples.
- Survey the whole
reading and summarize a child's vocabulary development at school
age (about 5 years): How many
words do children know? What domains of meaning are the words likely
to come from? How many of the English inflectional suffixes have
they mastered (refer to An Overview of the English Morphological System
for a chart). Have they begun learning derivational affixes? What
strategies do they have for making up words if they need a word for
a concept that is as yet unnamed for them?
|
"Vocabulary
in Context"
by Ann Fisher Kruse and "Word Frequency and the Importance of Context
in Vocabulary Learning" by John G. Honeyfield
Although these
readings are about teaching English as a Second Language (ESL), much
of what is said applies to native speakers of English as well. Certainly,
the vocabulary enrichment techniques they teach are usable in language
arts classes for native speakers.
- What do these two readings have in common with one
another?
- What do the
readings, especially Honeyfield, have in common with Miller & Gildea's
piece?
- In your own experience, what has helped you most
in increasing your vocabulary? Did you have to do tasks like dictionary
lookup, writing sentences with new words, and memorizing definitions
in your schooling? Were you taught skills for guessing word meaning
from context? When you read now, what do you do when you encounter
an unknown word? Over the next few days, monitor yourself while you
read textbooks, novels, magazines, or newspapers. Make a note of unknown
words that you encounter, and how you respond to them. Be ready to
share an example or two with the class.
|
"Second-Language Acquisition Research" by Rod Ellis --
coming soon |
"Linguistic Diversity in Multicultural Classrooms" by
Sonia Nieto
- Nieto notes that many parents, educators and others
who oppose bilingual education sincerely have children's best interests
at heart. She insists that they are, nevertheless, wrong. What are
her arguments?
- Nieto brings in the issue of socioeconomic class.
How does class enter into outcomes of education for children who speak
Spanish? Cite Nieto's specific examples.
- According to
Nieto, children whose first language is not English need "a minimum of five to seven years to develop the
level of English proficiency needed to succeed academically". Yet,
California law permits only one year of education that uses the student's
primary language even minimally, under ordinary cirumstances. What
do you think of this?
- According to Nieto, which type or types of bilingual
programs work best?
- State three or four similarities between Nieto's
position on how to deal with language-minority children and the position
advocated in class and in the readings concerning minority-dialect
children (children who speak nonstandard English).
|
"Language
Diversity and Learning" by Lisa Delpit
- What similarities
do you find between this reading and Wheeler and Swords ("Codeswitching")?
- Delpit gives numerous examples of real-life situations involving
students who spoke non-standard dialects. Choose three of these that
made a strong impression on you. Why did Delpit include each of these
examples? What lesson did she intend for the reader to learn from it?
- Think back to Gee's ideas about mainstream and nonmainstream discourse
(see the bottom of this page). What are some specific ways in
which the differences between a child's nonmainstream home discourse
and the dominant (school) discourse present obstacles to learning and
to the teacher/child relationship?
- What are some specific things a teacher could do to serve children
of nonmainstream communities better?
|
"Codeswitching" by
Rebecca Wheeler and Rachel Swords -- coming soon
- What does it mean for a person to codeswitch?
- How would you define dialect prejudice? Why does dialect
prejudice exist?
- Describe the teaching technique called contrastive analysis.
- Wheeler and
Swords write, "It can be a very damaging human
experience for an AAVE speaking child to learn Mainstream American
English while the teacher dismisses AAVE as broken and error-filled." What
kind of damage do you think can result from such treatment?
- What positive changes and outcomes resulted from Swords' adoption
of the contrastive analysis technique in her third-grade class?
|
Connecting school problems
among children from non-mainstream backgrounds to Gee’s theory of
‘discourse’
- A child’s primary discourse consists
of not just the child’s language, but of their whole
way of being in their home community: socially appropriate behavior;
how adults and older children respond to (un)acceptable behavior;
what the home community’s values are (family ties? economic
success? knowing a lot about the world at large? helping others? strong
self-discipline? cooperation? competitiveness? responsibility for
taking care of others? religion? hard work? shopping? hobbies?
handwork/crafts/music, etc. as ways of creating an individual identity
and building self-worth? ways of celebrating important events? acquiring
material goods? reading as a leisure activity? spending time outdoors
or in nature? sports as a form of community or subgroup bonding? prioritizing
work, family, friends, community obligations? attention to health?
gender roles? What is considered ‘work’, and what ‘fun’?
Is having fun (entertainment, leisure activities) a major value of
the community? Tolerance of groups unlike themselves? Attitudes about
‘proper’ and ‘improper’ language? Open discussion
of values, events, experiences among family members? Routines: is
life lived on a regular schedule; is being on time important; how
frequent are breaks from work, etc.)
- With regard
to language, more is involved than pronunciation of words, vocabulary,
and grammar. Interactive language practices of the primary discourse
can set the child up for a significant match or mismatch with the
discourse of school. In the home community,
- How are children supposed to address and respond
to adults?
- What kinds
of questions do adults ask children? Do they "play teacher" by
asking the child questions about the world, asking them to recite
the alphabet, spell words, or do simple math problems? Or do
they just ask questions typical of ordinary communication, such
as whether the child likes something, is hungry, played with
friends today, etc.?
- Are children considered conversation partners with
adults, or are verbal interactions mainly sets of commands as to
what to do or not do; requests from the child for wants and needs,
etc.?
- Are children expected to change the way they talk
(e.g., by showing greater respect) when they are talking to adults
vs. when they are talking to their siblings and peers?
- Are children expected to make eye contact with
adults when answering a question or otherwise addressing an adult?
- Are children expected to take the initiative in
an adult/child interaction, or wait for prompting from the adult?
- Are children
encouraged to display their abilities in front of others, or
to "not stand out in a crowd"?
- Are children
expected to talk loudly or softly?
- Are long silences tolerated in social situations?
- Are boys and girls allowed to engage in the same
kind of talk (cursing, loud talking, talking back, questioning authority,
etc.)?
- Do people talk while engaged in other activities,
such as housework, watching TV, reading a book or newspaper, etc.?
- Are all types of interruption considered impolite?
- Do adults
issue commands directly to children, by saying, for example, "Stop that!", "Sit down at
the table and eat your dinner right now!", "Do what your
daddy says or go to time-out!"; or do they issue commands indirectly,
for instance, "You shouldn't do that, sweetie. It's impolite";
"It's time for everyone to sit down and eat now"; "If
you don't do what Daddy says, we might have to send you to time-out"?
- Are insults allowed between children and adults,
even in play?
- How direct are people allowed to be in stating
their opinions?
- What are ‘good manners’ and ‘bad
manners’? Are manners important in the home community or in
the child’s home?
- Children’s expectations regarding adult behaviors:
caregiving, discipline, ‘refereeing’ interaction of
children in groups; listening to child’s woes; acceptance
of children’s explanations / reasons / excuses
- Appropriateness of children correcting adults or
adults correcting children
- All children, regardless of socioeconomic status,
grow up with a primary discourse. A primary discourse is essentially
the same thing as a culture, as Gee uses the term. Children cannot
survive as human beings without a discourse, except as 'wild children'
such as have occasionally been discovered in past eras.
- A secondary discourse is
any discourse that is not the primary discourse. 2ndary discourses
may involve as much learning as acquisition (that is, as much conscious
learning, including via being taught by others, as in ‘picking up’
rules for behavior by observation, trial, and error). Secondary discourses
may involve activities outside the home, as varied as youth religious
clubs and street gangs, a community chorus or a soccer team. School
and the working world it is supposed to prepare children for is a
secondary discourse; Gee’s broad definition of literacy is
mastery of a secondary discourse, but for our purposes we focus especially
on the discourse of the school.
|