English Department (Linguistics)
Cal Poly State University San Luis Obispo
Last updated 10/1/11
© 2011 Johanna Rubba

ENGL 391: Topics in Applied Linguistics: Linguistics and Language Arts
Course Project: A Critique of State-Approved Language Arts Teaching Materials

Grammar Instruction

Plagiarism/cheating warning
NOTE: ALL FORMS OF CHEATING WILL RESULT IN LOWERING OF THE COURSE GRADE (INCLUDING A POSSIBLEGRADE OF F FOR THE COURSE) AND A REPORT TO THE OFFICE OF STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES. VISIT THEIR WEBSITE AND STUDY ALL OF ITS PAGES CAREFULLY. SERIOUS CHEATING CAN RESULT IN EXPULSION FROM CAL POLY. READ ALSO MY PLAGIARISM WARNING.

If at any point you have questions, definitely ask me for help. That's what I'm here for!


**IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS PROJECT DOES NOT INVOLVE INSTRUCTION FOR CHILDREN WHOSE NATIVE LANGUAGE IS NOT ENGLISH. THE TWO RELEVANT GROUPS ARE CHILDREN WHOSE NATIVE LANGUAGE IS STANDARD ENGLISH  AND CHILDREN WHOSE NATIVE LANGUAGE IS NONSTANDARD ENGLISH.
**

*Print this out and use it as a checklist; take it with you to the library or wherever you look at your materials.*

These instructions have three parts:
1) Detailed project instructions.
2) Formatting instructions. You will lose points if you do not follow these instructions.
3) Editing/Proofreading instructions.
You will lose points if you do not follow these instructions.

> MATERIAL TO EXAMINE:

> TASKS:

PART I:  Describe briefly the materials you examined (e.g., grammar/writing manual, TAE, practice book). This should not take more than a page. Then, briefly describe the publisher's approach to grammar instruction: Is it a correctionist, one-right-way approach? Are different styles or dialects acknowledged at all? If they are, are they characterized as mistakes, or as appropriate to other than school/professional situations? MOST IMPORTANT: Does the publisher's approach conform to recommendations made in class, especially with regard to speakers of nonstandard English? Give this information in general terms; reserve details for following sections. This whole section can be very short -- less than three pages.

PART II
To illustrate the publisher's approach, choose TWO specific grammar topics from the list below. For each topic:

PART III Lastly, having determined the publisher's approach, return to the question of whether or not the materials conform to recommendations made in class.

PART IV Reference list. List only sources that you actually cite in the text, including the materials you examine. You MUST cite our class readings!! Use a recognized format: MLA or APA. If you don't know what this means, many college writing manuals exist which can provide help; online resources include http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/05/ and http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.

> GRAMMAR POINTS: Choose two of these.

> FORMATTING INSTRUCTIONS     IF YOU DO NOT FOLLOW THE FORMATTING INSTRUCTIONS, YOU WILL DEFINITELY LOSE POINTS!  If there is something about formatting that you don't know how do, ask a friend, consult your word processors' HELP function, or ask me. I'm a Mac user, but I'll do my best to help PC users.

PRINT THIS OUT AND USE IT AS A CHECKLIST:

> PROOFREADING AND EDITING At whatever level you eventually teach or write in your career, you will be expected to conform to the current standards for formal grammar, spelling, punctuation, paragraph formatting, etc. Expectations are particularly high for language arts and English teachers. College professors vary a great deal in their expectations in this regard, but the state standards for both teachers and schoolchildren expect full compliance. I also expect full compliance.

Back to top of page