I. The example of eyewitness testimony
A. characteristics
2. failures to remember, misremember, & combine
experiences
B. errors as a function of encoding
1. verbatim vs. gist knowledgea. greater emphasis on verbatim information2. a function of their lesser knowledgea. 3 yr. olds' vs. 7 yr. olds' responses to "Did the nurse lick your knee?" (Gordon et al., 1991) b. Sam Stone stories (Leichtman & Ceci, 1995)
C. errors as a function of storage1. repeated exposure to stereotyped stories led to errors2. 3 yr. olds: 72% he did it; 44% saw him; 21% kept
3. 5 & 6 yr olds. less likely to make the claims
1. suggestibility is greater for children under 62. reality monitoring & preschoolers
3. forgetting is much more rapid
D. errors as a function of retrieval
2. recall vs. recognition
3. encouragement to think deeply about an event4. the number of times questioned
E. What develops?
II. Basic Capabilities
A. Recognition & retention in infancy and early childhood1. explicit vs. implicit memoriesa. recollection vs. behavior2. associationb. implicit from birth
c. explicit memory from about 8 months on
1. development of the prefrontal cortex & amygdalaa. present at birth, tested with operant conditioning3. recognitiona. habituation paradigms & infancy1. Fantz et al. (1975) w/ 2 month oldsa. prefer new items even after 2 weeks
2. what is recognized (Strauss & Cohen, 1978)
a. 5 month olds were habituated to 4-attribute shapesb. 0 min: all 4; 15 min: shape & color; 24 hrs: form
B. Insight, generalization, & integration (Rovee-Collier & others)b. old vs. new recognition1. 2 yrs: recognition > adult recall2. 4 yrs: 100 - 95% correct with 25 pictures
1. in 3 month olds with the mobile taska. abrupt learning, but very specific2. inhibitionb. can learn to generalize with multiple mobile presentations
c. recall with reinstatement w/in 3 days
a. frontal lobe development1. increase in synapses @ 1 year and btn 4 and 7 yrs2. inhibition of responses in the A-not B task
b. "Simon says" & other like tasks
1. difficult at 4-5 years2. success at 7 years old
3. commands should stress "do" rather than "stop"
C. Infantile amnesia1. Freud’s thesis D. Processing capacity2. other possibilities: maturation of the frontal lobes, influence of the social world, changes in coding
1. memory spana. span approximately matches a child's age up to 7 items2. Casea. differentiated between storage vs. processing capacity
E. Processing speed
III. Strategies1. speed increase with age (3 sec/operation @ 5 yrs. vs. 1 sec for 14 yr olds)F. Evaluation2. not necessarily a function of practice or use of strategies
1. very important for understanding memory development
A. defined
2. characteristics of strategy use in children
b. vary based on experience
b. but unlikely to be used in confusing settings (hidden under similar objects) for 2 vs. 3 yr olds
c. 8 year olds spontaneously use markers, but 5 year olds need hints
1. 5 vs. 10 year oldsa. less likely to rehearse spontaneously2. Ornstein et al. (1975) - isolated vs. cumulative rehearsalb. but will show improvement with rehearsal
D. Organization1. less likely for 5 & 6 year olds2. but again, trial-to-trial variability
E. Selective Attention (deploying cognitive resources)1. increases between 3 and 8a. Miller's selective attention experiments2. systematicity of deployment1. younger children will search all boxes2. most advanced will selectively search and remember more
a. Vurpillot's comparison studies
F. ExplanationsIV. Metacognition1. mediational vs. production deficiencyG. Evaluationa. neither are adequate2. cost-benefits analysisa. strategy use increases w/ monetary rewards & easy tasks3. utilizational deficiencya. cost of mental resources while learning strategy use1. since training does not always lead to use, perhaps metacognition is relevant
A. Explicit metacognitive knowledgeV. Content knowledge (knowledge base)1. age related differencesB. Implicit metacognitive knowledgea. knowledge about tasks, strategies, & people2. fallibility of memoryb. acquired between ages 5 and 10
a. most children beyond 6 yrs know they forget3. 1/2 of first graders knowa. gist is easier than verbatim4. but weak relation with metamemoric knowledge and performanceb. recognition is easier than recall
1. fewer age related differencesC. Evaluation2. examples
a. self-monitoring of language by 2 year-oldsb. feeling-of-knowing by 4 and 5 yr olds
3. but far from perfect1. could accurately predict their recognitiona. monitoring one's comprehension1. good and older readers look for the incongruenciesa. reread or read more slowly2. younger and poorer readers are less likely to rereadb. choosing how much to study1. not until 12 and 13 years olda. focus more attention on unmastered material b. 7 year olds focus on everything, 9 year olds on what they didn't know; = performance
1. yet, transfer of strategies is rare
A. Quantity remembered1. representative studiesB. Quality remembereda. chess knowledge1. Chi (1978) w/ 10 year old chess masters2. Schneider et al. (1993) chess expertise rather than age
b. cartoons, etc. (Lindberg 1980, 1991)c. soccer knowledge & IQ (Schneider et al., 1989)
1. though high IQ children may acquire knowledge faster1. influences what is and is not rememberedC. Influence on other processesa. e.g., inferences: creature w/ broken wing = bird2. script knowledgea. present by the age of 33. effects of stories & questions1. day care routine, birthday parties, daily routine, etc.2. but preschoolers may misremember depending on frequency
a. pay before eatingb. by age 7, greater discrimination about specifics
a. seem to be relevant in forming scriptsb. story schemas: setting, event, response, goal, attempt, resolution
1. 3 yr olds: no goals or internal reactions, add unrelated details2. 4 yr olds: more actions, but still not many goals/reactions
3. at 5: all parts are included
1. basic processesD. Possible mechanismsa. encoding is more efficient with familiar info2. strategiesb. the more familiar the content, the more can be held in WM (chunking)
a. organization is more evident with familiar categories3. metacognitionb. 8 yr olds with familiar = recall of 11 yr olds with unfamiliar
c. could apply new strategies more easily to familiar content
a. child chess experts better predict how much they could remember1. encoding of distinctive featuresE. Evaluation2. spreading activation (connectionist model)
1. seems to be a large component of age differences in memory