I. Some basic considerations
A. holding back
B. standardized testing
1. can predict success in school or current knowledge level
C. process approach
II. Counting1. how do children allocate attention?2. how do children choose strategies?
3. what causes individual differences?
A. early competency1. cardinalityB. 3 types of competencea. absolute numerical sizeb. development
2. counting1. in the first 6 mos - 1 vs 2, 2 vs 3c. processes2. age 3-4: 4 from 5 or 6
1. subitizing: perceptual process2. subtraction & addition of 1
a. principles1. one-oneb. by age 5 complete understanding2. stable order
3. cardinal
4. order irrelevance
5. abstraction
3. ordinality - relational1. perhaps facilitated by Sesame Streeta. more or less develops between 12 - 18 months4. most 5 year olds1. reinforcement studiesb. by 4 -5 use with larger number setsa. can count to 20b. know the relative sizes of numbers 1 to 10
c. work with basic number principles
1. procedural, conceptual, utilizational
III. Basic Arithmetic
A. use of varied strategies for solutions
b. involves the prefrontal cortex, motor cortex, parietal lobe, and other areas in both hemispheres
B. strategy development
3. changes in speed and accuracy
b. also more sophisticated and faster strategies
a. faster development in East Asia and Europe
C. strategy choice1. backup vs. retrieval strategiesD. applications to teachinga. choices seen even in young children2. retrieval will be used for more familiar problemsb. preference for accuracy
a. a build up of association increases the likelihood of direct retrievalb. flat vs. peaked distributions
1. it's okay to use one's fingers!
b. good students, not so good students, perfectionists
2. predicts differences in performance for perfectionists
on standardized vs. untimed testing
1. characteristics
b. difficulty in retrieving correct answers
2. use backup strategies poorly and slowly
3. rarely use retrieval
a. limited exposure to numbersb. limited working-memory capacity
c. limited conceptual understanding
F. conceptual competence: principles1. inversion principle: a + b - b = ?G. context effects: word problemsa. develops between 6 and 91. size of b is related to time to solveb. but not till 11 can they ignore b2. mathematical equality: 3 + 4 + 5 = + 5a. = is seen as a command rather than as equality even to 4th grade b. success correlates with correct speech and pointing
c. discrepancy between the two is easier to remedy than when both are at a low level
IV. Complex arithmetic1. memory demands are a challengea. small numbers do not necessarily help2. unfamiliar contexts1. interpretation precedes calculationa. e.g. Brazilian street children
1. could solve all problems using their own goods, many problems using goods from other stands, but less than half without a sales context!
A. buggy subtraction algorithms
1. zero subtraction & no borrowing
2. less common in Korea
B. fractions
V. Computer Programming1. 1/2 + 1/3 = 2/5; common error even at community collegesC. algebra2. need to think of magnitude
a. errors present even in adolescents & adults3. extends to decimal fractionsa. 2.86 < 2.357 because of digits after the decimalb. but vice versa, too
1. symbol manipulation ? application or understandinga. e.g., a · (b+c) ? a + (b · c)2. some strategies to check appropriateness of proceduresa. inserting actual numbersb. citing a rule
1. but, may not be an accurate one 2. first year engineering students interpreted "there are six times as many students as there are professors" as 6S = P!
A. hypothesized to increase programming and general skills1. Papert’s LOGOB. Klahr & Carver (1988)2. most successful with mediated instruction
a. how to use + feedback b. explicitly making analogies, pointing out general programming concepts
1. instruction in debugging could transferC. transfer also seen in younger children2. 8-11 yr olds were faster with instruction
1. problem-solving with LOGO led to increased scores on analogical reasoning tests in 2nd graders
I. ReadingAcademic Skills II — Reading & Writing
A. Chronological approach (Chall, 1979)
2. Stage 1 (1st & 2nd grade): phonological recoding skill development. learn letter names and sounds
3. Stage 2 (2nd & 3rd grade): increased fluency, but still not reading for learning
4. Stage 3 (4th - 8th grade): reading to learn
5. Stage 4 (high school & beyond): comprehension of written material from multiple viewpoints
B. Pre-reading Skills
2. letter perception
a. in most contexts, orientation does not affect meaning
3. phonemic awareness
a. words consist of separable sounds
c. can be taught; leads to better reading/spelling up to 4 yrs later
d. may be related to exposure to nursery rhymes
1. predicts later performance at age 32. also instructionally related
4. precocious readers
a. some children spontaneously pick up reading around 2 or 31. related somewhat to IQ2. other differences
a. greater verbal knowledge and larger WM spans3. does not negatively affect later performanceb. mastery of prereading skills
c. interest in reading
4. predicts later skill through grade 6
a. teaching does not produce the same correlation
C. Learning to read1. identifying individual words
a. 40% of those with poor WI skills reported that cleaning their room was more fun than reading!b. two methods
1. phonological recodinga. emphasis of the phonics approachb. important for word attack skills
1. for the 3,000 words in a beginning reader, 70% occurred fewer than 5X, 40% occurred only oncec. supports later visually based retrieval
2. visually based retrieval
a. emphasis of the whole-word approach
2. strategy choice
3. dyslexiaa. phonological dyslexia - trouble with phonological recoding1. evident with pronounceable non-words & exceptions2. poor reading can extend to adulthood, teaching helps
a. strategies for circumventing b. improving phonological recoding
1. draw analogies with known words, try alternative pronunciations, identify parts that are known
D. ComprehensionII. Writing1. 4 components
a. lexical access, proposition assembly, proposition integration, text modeling 2. what develops in comprehension?b. listening comprehension often exceeds reading comprehension up to about 8th grade
a. basic processes
1. automatization of word identification 2. increased working memory capacity
b. strategies
1. adjusting speed and carefulness to difficulty of text
a. skimming rarely before age 14
c. metacognitive knowledge
1. better readers are better monitors than poor readers d. content knowledge2. some of their strategies
a. rereading, slowing down, visualizing, concretizing
1. relevant prior knowledge 2. focus on causal relations
a. 8 yr olds emphasize causes within an episode, 14 yr olds link across episodes 3. story schemas
3. instructional implications
a. make sure that background knowledge is supplied b. reciprocal instruction (Palinscar & Brown, 1984)
1. 7th graders’ reading skills were at grade level, but comprehension was delayed 2. emphasized comprehension monitoring
3. corroborating evidence from other research a. summarizing, clarifying, questioning, anticipating future questions 1. after 20 sessions, 60% of statements accurately captured the main idea 2. comprehension went from 20% to 80%
3. still present 6 months later, transferred to other subjects
A. subprocesses1. initial drafting & revisionB. Initial drafting - demands of unfamiliar topics2. necessary skills even in adulthood (19% on memos, letters, etc.)
1. must activate relevant info and pull it togetherC. Initial drafting - demands of multiple goals2. often a list of facts rather than an organized presentation
1. variety of goals with little feedback from others2. knowledge telling approach
a. answer directly & write down all of relevant info3. improving writing involves considering multiple goalsb. often very brief in length (about 1/2 page)
a. Berieter & Scardamalia (1987) 4. knowledge transforming approach
1. used decks of cards with common sentence openers 2. led to more interesting essays
a. combines deciding what to say and how to say it1. part 1: analysis of subject, adopting a point of view b. evident in time to begin writing2. part 2: moving back and forth btn content area and writing strategies; comparisons of intent with reality
1. college students take more time than 5th graders
D. mechanical requirements2. take more time with longer essays1. includes forming letters, spelling words, punctuation, capitalization 2. Berieter & Scardamalia (1982) tested 4th & 6th graders
E. revisiona. typical-writing, slow-dictation, standard-dictation3. similar results with word processingb. typical-writing < slow-dictation < standard-dictation
a. some transfer back to writing by hand, too1. problemsa. not always done, may not improve2. identifying weaknessesa. correcting another’s writing: sentences were missing, contradictory, or uninterpretable
1. identified by 25% of 4th graders, 60% of 6th graders
b. egocentrism in correcting one’s own writing
2. but waiting doesn’t really help
a. spontaneous recognition = good correctionsb. 6th graders could cope with other identified errors