I. Some basics
A. three processes
1. encoding: translating info to be used in processingB. modal model (Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1971)2. storage: holding for later use
3. retrieval: accessing stored info; forgetting is the inability to retrieve
1. sensory memory, short term memory, long term memory2. serial position effect
a. primacy = LTM; recency = STM
II. Sensory Memory
A. preliminary characteristics1. initial brief storage of sensory infoB. Sperling (1960) & iconic store2. separate sensory stores for each sense system
1. whole report vs. partial reportC. Echoic storea. 4-5 letters even with 500 msec presentation2. capacity: 9/12, 12/16, or greater?b. with partial report 3-4 letters were reported
3. coding: icon- visual only
a. tones to report vowels vs. letters = whole report4. duration: 150 - 250 msecb. successful cues: color or brightness
a. delay of cueb. position vs. identity: position does fade
1. partial-report vs. full report revisitedD. Sensory stores in summarya. the 3-eared/4-eared listener2. capacity: 9 -16 items3. duration: 250 - 4000 msec
4. the suffix effect (Crowder, 1972)
a. auditory presentation followed by auditory cueb. masks info in echoic store
1. modality specificE. Function of sensory stores2. relatively large in capacity, but brief in duration
3. stimuli is relatively unprocessed
1. temporary storage to select items for further processing2. not important at all
a. Neath (1998) and telephone operators!
III. Short-term Memory
A. capacity of STM1. 7 + 2 (Miller, 1956)B. coding in STMa. dots, marbles, nonsense syllables, etc.2. influencesa. chunkingb. # of syllables
1. auditorya. evidence from Conrad (1964)2. visual
a. Posner & Keele (1967)
3. semantic encoding
a. release from proactive inhibition/interference (Wickens and others 1963, 1973)
1. presentation of same category items (e.g., letters, numbers, animal names) leads to a build up of PI
2. experimental group "switched" within the 10 trials
3. those with the switch showed release from PI
C. duration & forgetting
1. two possibile mechanisms: decay (fading over time) & interference
a. two types of interference: proactive and retroactive
2. decay in about 20 seconds
a. Brown-Peterson task (paradigm)
2. 80% correct after 3 sec. vs. 7% correct after 18 seconds
a. Waugh & Norman’s (1965) probe digit task
2. only number of interfering items was significant
3. evidence of retroactive interference
b. release from PI as evidence of proactive interference
b. it may not be possible to design the perfect STM forgetting
experiment!
2. exhaustive vs. self-terminating search
3. Sternberg (1966)
b. exceptions
1. scanning from multiple categories
2. ordered stimuli
A. Atkinson & Shiffrin’s original conception1. STS acts as a storage place & activates info in LTMB. Baddeley & Hitch (1974) tested these assumptions2. control processes
a. control of the short term bufferb. coding
1. store digits while doing another task (e.g., verifying sentences like "A is preceded by B")
a. acc. to A & S, this should be nearly impossible 2. found that it took longer with 6 digits, but could be done3. proposed "working memory"
a. storage and processing space
C. the modelV. Neurocognition1. central executivea. limited resources and capacity2. phonological loop and visuo-spatial sketch padb. controls processing
a. storage and maintenance b. tasks requiring greater use of the central executive are more disruptive/disrupted
1. Teasdale et al. (1995) and stimulus-independent thoughts (SITs)
A. H. M.1. lesions in temporal lobe & hippocampusa. loss of new episodic memories2. intact STMb. anterograde amnesia
c. some retrograde amnesia for the years before the operation
3. LTM for procedural skills
B. frontal lobe and working memory
1. damage increases distractibilityC. PET scans1. limbic area for familiar stimuliD. creating long-term memories2. also, evidence for working memory
a. blood flow in left frontal and left parietal: verbal WMb. right parietal, temporal, and frontal: spatial WM
1. STM as a reverberating circuit = long term potentiationE. many questions1. localized vs. distributed memory processes?2. basic neural processes in any one complex activity?