Key Decisions on Affirmative Action

In a series of split and often very close decisions, the Supreme Court has expressed a variety of
reservations in specific situations.

Year Favorable/ Unfavorable Policy
Case
Vote
Ruling
1971 yes Griggs v. Duke Power Co. 9-0
Private employers must provide a remedy where minorities were denied opportunities, even if unintentional
1978 no Regents of the University
of Califiomia v. Bakke
5-4 Prohibited specific number
of places for minorities in
college admissions
1979 yes United Steelworkers
of America v. Weber
5-2 Okay for union to favor
minorities in special training programs
1984 no Firefighters Local Union
No I784 (Memphis, TN)
v. Stotts
6-1 Seniority means recently
hired minorities may be
laid off first in staff reductions
1986 yes International Associatiation of Firefighters
v. City of Cleveland
6-3 May promote minorities
over more senior Whites
1986 yes New York City v,
Sheet Metal
5-4 Approved specific quota of
minority workers for union
1987 yes United States
v. Paradise
5-4 Endorsed quotas for promotions of state troopers
1987 yes Johnson v. Transportation Agency,
Santa Clara, CA
6-3 Approved preference in
hiring for minorities and
women over better qualified men and Whites
1989 no Richmond v. Croson
Company
6-3 Ruled a 30 percent set-aside program for minority
contractors unconstitutional
1989 no Martin v. Wilks 5-4 Ruled Whites may bring reverse discrimination claims
against court-approved affirmative action plans
1990 yes Metro Boadcasting
v. FCC
5-4 Supported federal program
aimed at increasing minority ownership of broadcast
licenses
1995 no Adarand Construction
Inc. v. Pena
5-4 Benefits based on race are constitutional only if
narrowly defined to accomplish a compelling interest
1996 no Texas v. Hopwood * Let stand a lower court decision covering Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Texas that
race could not be used in
college admissions
2003 yes Grutter v. Bollinger 5-4 Race can be a factor in admissions at the University
of Michigan Law School
2003 no Grutz v. Bolinger 6-3 Cannot use a strict formula
awarding advantage based
on race for admissions to
the University of Michigan


return to Soc 316 or Issues Reader